 |
|
There's a battle being waged in Washington and it could lead to less local news. The war's being
fought over a simple issue. Should one company be allowed to own more than one television
station? Opponents say no, media giants could swallow up stations and control the news. If this
were 1935, that'd be a pretty good argument. Media was a lot different back then. Most towns
across America had a radio station or two, maybe a couple of newspapers, but not much more.
Today the world's a much different place. There are hundreds of cable channels, thousands of
radio stations and too many internet sites to even count. A media monopoly is simply impossible
in today's world.
But an overreaction to an unrealistic threat could have serious consequences. In medium
and small television markets, the difference between profitability and loss can be thin.
Operating two stations gives companies like ours the ability to deliver another news voice to
the market. It means more local news not less. It means more local jobs. It's good for our
community.
|
 |